DataMaven Coach

You may want to post this as a question instead of an idea, as this can most likely be achieved already.

If you don't want the credit consumption, you don't want the more frequent updates. A request to run domostats dataset more frequently is already an idea requested. Most visited dashboards is definitely something that can be done with day-old data. Think about why a last accessed date would need to be less than a day old…

YES PLEASE! This is another one I keep meaning to add as an idea! @JoshMillheim - This comes up a lot. Here are a couple scenarios I can think of off the top of my head, but there are certainly more. I have spent hours flipping individual cards and chasing beast mode errors. Scenario #1 - Sometimes you need to switch to…

Are we not able to upvote after it gets a suggested workaround?

YES PLEASE! I keep meaning to put this one in!

It would be great to be able to actually manage the schedules from an interface, since it's a lot of clicks otherwise. @ArborRose - It seems like what you are looking for can be achieved using the Datasets History Dataset, joined to the Datasets Dataset. Then use the Gantt chart to show the histories and durations of the…

That gets dicey fast. Best practice is to leave your company time zone at UTC. That will minimize the number of datasets that require conversion in most cases.

There are many unclear actions and object types in the activity log. I have provided extensive feedback and been sent in a loop. There are also a lot of actions that propagate a nonsensical volume of entries, as well as entries that don't provide the most basic information to make the row relevant or useable. @WHM - That's…

Totally agree - we have asked for this for years. That being said, you can set up automations to run the most critical datasets more often. If you want to explore that option, please post it as a question, and I am sure one of our brilliant friends will provide the details!

This one should have been a question, rather than an idea. It's good to ask the questions first so that folks get credit for solutions. Then, if it turns out that it's an enhancement request, it can be submitted as an idea and upvoted.

When you set up the key, it should have been named appropriately for the purpose. That way, you can check on it. ALL tokens expire. The maximum time is 10 years. For notifications, check this setting: 3 Dots Menu > Notifications

The solution we have been told for years has been to 'just have different email addresses for each instance.' That is so unworkable for consultants that it's not even funny! How sweet would it be if any instance where your user id is the same email, it used the same password? Basically the opposite of how it is now.…

We've been suggesting a 'View Only' level of access for datasets for YEARS! You make an interesting point, though. People would still need to be able to share datasets in most cases, and that comes with the ability to unshare. Thinking through the back end of this may get complicated because if they can build something and…

You can also trigger them on your own schedule from a server or using windows scheduler and the CLI.

That is very strange. It looks like it's maybe including the difference in the number somehow. I tried a few different calculations to see if I could do some hinky math to ascertain what is happening, and no dice! I recommend opening a support ticket.

The old version used to ask if you wanted to update the data, but I am thinking from you question that this no longer happens. Sorry to hear that. What limitations prevent you from displaying the data in Domo? We may be able to solve for that, too.

I have heard that the functionality you are looking for is coming. At this time, when you select a beast mode to include in a subsequent beast mode, it just inputs the formula, as you have seen. I didn't see this in the most recent release notes, but I am told that this functionality is getting ready for testing.

It will be called 'PAGE' because that is what dashboards used to be called. For the metric you are looking for, I recommend using the 'Pages' dataset instead of the activity log.

We've been asking for this for YEARS!

That's how I do it, too. It's annoying to not be able to just click on it and change the dataset, but I can see why they did it that way. A new dataset would likely automatically update the alias and break everything. The solution @jaeW_at_Onyx suggested works perfectly every time, as long as the new dataset has the right…

One shouldn't have to go deep to achieve such a basic end. Also - I don't think the toolkit does that and it's a premium feature. It would be great if PDP rules could simply have a 'copy to dataset' option right there in the UI.

It doesn't have that? That's simply not logical.

When they are developing functionalities, I wonder if they really think about the most likely use case. Every other filter mechanism is for including, except that one, and it's strange. I always figured it was a bug.

NECESSARY!!!!!! Sometimes there are 100!

I hit ctrl+z all the time forgetting that it will do NOTHING!

This should not be tribal knowledge, and it totally is. Also, the explanations and examples could be much improved. But - first things first…tell us our options!

So much cleaner! And it could just be right there in the tile under the beast mode name and pop up when you hover, just like any dataset field. YES PLEASE!!!

It almost always picks the dumbest fields possible. Like - Let's say it's transaction data…It will give you something like: Bar chart with the vendor created date (or most irrelevant date possible), value as the sum of item number, and series of transaction id. It boggles the mind, and I wonder what the backend logic is.…

This is another idea that has been requested time and again. I think @Ashleigh has requested it a lot previously. (If it was someone else, oops!) I find myself wanting it SO OFTEN! Addendum to the screenshot above - I would like to see it not necessarily fully detach the sections, but to simply be able to identify sections…

They have been adding clicks to EVERYTHING in the last year.